Who Truly Deserved The Iron Throne?

Hey guys, let's dive deep into the world of Westeros and discuss a question that has sparked countless debates: Who should have ultimately won Game of Thrones? The final season, as we all know, was a rollercoaster, and many felt the ending didn't quite land the way it should have. So, let's break down the contenders, their motivations, and why some characters might have deserved the Iron Throne more than others. This isn't just about power; it's about leadership, vision, and the ability to unite a fractured kingdom. We're going to explore the nuances of each character's journey and analyze their fitness to rule. Buckle up, because we're about to journey through the epic highs and lows of the Seven Kingdoms, looking at the characters who could have brought true change and stability.

Daenerys Targaryen: The Dragon Queen's Ascent and Fall

First up, let's talk about Daenerys Targaryen, the Mother of Dragons. Daenerys' journey from a timid girl sold into marriage to a powerful queen is one of the most compelling arcs in Game of Thrones. She began with nothing and clawed her way to the top, freeing slaves, building an army, and ultimately setting her sights on Westeros. Her early actions showcased a strong sense of justice and a desire to break the wheel of oppression, which resonated with many viewers. But, her path to the Iron Throne was filled with a lot of controversies. She had a strong belief in her right to rule, stemming from her family's history, but that also meant being willing to use fire and blood, which ultimately would become her downfall.

Daenerys' belief that she was destined to rule the Seven Kingdoms was almost ironclad. She saw herself as a liberator, someone who would bring order and justice to a land riddled with corruption and tyranny. She had the dragons, the armies, and the strategic mind to unite the kingdoms, at least on the battlefield. Her vision, as she understood it, was to burn away the old system and build a new, more just society. The problem, as Game of Thrones so dramatically portrayed, was her methods. Her ruthlessness in the later seasons, particularly her fiery descent on King's Landing, revealed a darker side. It was a descent that raised serious questions about her suitability to rule. Was she truly the benevolent queen she claimed to be, or was she just another Targaryen, consumed by the desire for power and willing to sacrifice everything, including innocent lives, to get it? The choices she made in the pursuit of the Iron Throne ultimately cost her everything. This included the trust of her allies, the respect of her subjects, and, ultimately, her life. Her narrative showed how the burden of power can corrupt even the best intentions.

The Controversial Finale

The most controversial part of Daenerys' storyline was her transformation in the final season. Her decisions in King's Landing – the sudden, devastating attack on the city – shocked many viewers. It seemed to be an abrupt character shift, a move that contradicted the character we had come to know. Some viewers argued that this was a betrayal of her character arc, a disservice to the complex character she had developed. It did, however, raise questions about the nature of power, the corrupting influence it can have, and the price of ambition. While Daenerys had a strong claim to the Iron Throne, the events leading up to her demise cast doubt on her fitness to rule. Her final actions are a reminder that the path to the throne is paved with difficult choices, and the consequences of those choices can be devastating.

Jon Snow: The Reluctant King

Next, let's turn our attention to Jon Snow, a character who has become a fan favorite. Jon's journey is marked by honor, a strong sense of duty, and an unwavering commitment to doing what's right. Unlike Daenerys, Jon never actively sought the Iron Throne. His primary concern was always the safety and well-being of the realm. Jon's character arc is a testament to his dedication and nobility, making him a complex figure who constantly faces difficult choices. From his time at the Night's Watch to his battles against the White Walkers, Jon consistently put the needs of others before his own. This innate goodness, combined with his leadership skills, made him a natural fit for the Iron Throne. He was reluctant to take power, but he also understood the responsibilities that came with it.

Jon's willingness to make the hard choices, to sacrifice for the greater good, set him apart from the other contenders. His decision to unite with Daenerys, even when it meant bending the knee, showed a sense of duty that many others lacked. He recognized the threat of the White Walkers and put aside his personal ambitions to fight alongside his enemies. Moreover, his commitment to upholding justice and fairness made him a leader whom people could trust. He had the strength of character, strategic mind, and the respect of his peers, which all made him a strong candidate to rule. Jon's connection to the Starks also gave him a claim to the throne, as he was a true heir to the Iron Throne. He was someone who could be trusted to make decisions that were fair and just for everyone, even for his enemies. His actions throughout the series consistently reflected his moral compass.

The Weight of Duty

His role in the final season, especially his difficult decision regarding Daenerys, highlights the moral burden of leadership. He was willing to sacrifice everything to fulfill his duty, which ultimately showed how he was a great fit to rule. His actions were a testament to his character and his commitment to the realm. Jon faced a situation where the choice between love and duty was unavoidable. His decision, while controversial, showcased his dedication to doing what he believed was right, even if it meant making a devastating sacrifice. His actions, though difficult, showed what kind of leader he was. He had the strength of character, strategic mind, and the respect of his peers, which all made him a strong candidate to rule. The events leading up to his final decision show the moral and emotional toll it takes. Ultimately, Jon's character arc reflects the complexities of leadership and the sacrifices that come with it. His journey highlights the challenges of ruling and doing what's right, even when those things conflict with personal desires.

Tyrion Lannister: The Wise Hand

Now, let's consider Tyrion Lannister, a character whose wit, intelligence, and political acumen made him a pivotal figure. Tyrion's journey through Game of Thrones is a testament to the power of intellect and strategic thinking. Despite the prejudice he faced due to his family and his physical stature, Tyrion always used his mind to his advantage. He served as Hand of the King to several rulers, providing sage advice and navigating complex political landscapes. Tyrion's understanding of human nature, his ability to see both sides of an argument, and his pragmatic approach to governance made him a valuable asset to any ruler. He also had a strong moral compass. He was against the injustice and corruption in Westeros and always tried to do what was best for the people. This combination of cunning and integrity made him a natural choice for a leader.

Tyrion's ability to navigate the treacherous political waters of King's Landing, from his marriage to Sansa to his trial for the murder of Joffrey, showcased his resilience and strategic thinking. He was always thinking several steps ahead, trying to anticipate the moves of his enemies and protect those he cared about. His counsel to Daenerys, especially in the early seasons, was invaluable. He helped her navigate the complexities of ruling and avoid the mistakes that led to her downfall. Tyrion's perspective as an outsider, as someone who was never fully accepted by his family or the society, also gave him a unique insight into the problems of Westeros. He could see the flaws in the system and propose solutions that others couldn't. His understanding of the people, the various factions, and the history of Westeros made him an excellent advisor. He was not only clever and strategic but also genuinely cared about the well-being of the realm.

The Hand's Legacy

Tyrion's role in the final season, particularly his role in choosing the new ruler, highlights his enduring influence on Westeros. He was instrumental in shaping the future of the Seven Kingdoms. His decision to support Bran Stark, while controversial to some, reflected his understanding of what Westeros needed – a ruler who could see beyond the immediate political machinations and guide the realm towards a better future. The show's ending may not have been perfect, but Tyrion's role in the new council and his dedication to rebuilding Westeros showed his enduring legacy. He proved that wisdom and understanding of the game could have the same power as might. His influence was felt long after the final battle, with the new ruler, who would be key in shaping Westeros's destiny. His actions were a testament to his character and the positive impact he left on the realm.

Sansa Stark: The Queen in the North

Let's talk about Sansa Stark. Sansa's journey in Game of Thrones is one of the most remarkable transformations in the series. She starts as a naive young woman, dreaming of romance and courtly life, but the horrors she endures – the abuse, the betrayals, and the constant threat to her life – forge her into a shrewd, resilient leader. Sansa's evolution is a testament to her strength of character and her ability to learn from her mistakes. She understands the importance of alliances and the intricacies of political maneuvering. She has a deep connection with her people.

Sansa's experiences in King's Landing, her forced marriages, and the constant threat of violence taught her valuable lessons about survival, power, and the nature of leadership. She learned to read people, to anticipate their moves, and to use her intelligence and resourcefulness to protect herself and her loved ones. The horrors she endures shape her into a strong, resilient leader. Her ability to navigate these treacherous waters and eventually return to Winterfell as a leader demonstrated her growth. Her role in the battle of Winterfell, when she showed her strategic skills, also demonstrated her value as a leader. Sansa's transformation from a naive girl to a formidable leader shows how she took lessons from her experiences and applied them to her role as leader of the North. She had a deep understanding of her people and their needs, and her commitment to protecting them was unwavering.

The North Remembers

Her actions throughout the series consistently reflected her dedication to her people and her vision for a better future. Sansa's dedication to her people, her independence, and her ability to learn from her mistakes make her a compelling candidate for leadership. She had a deep understanding of the people and their needs, and her commitment to protecting them was unwavering. In the end, her choice to rule the North independently reflects her growth and her readiness to lead. Her final actions are a reminder of her journey, and her strength of character has become an important part of the political landscape in Westeros. Her growth shows her understanding of the challenges in ruling and the importance of looking out for the people.

Bran Stark: The Three-Eyed Raven

Finally, we have Bran Stark. Bran's journey in Game of Thrones is unique, as he becomes the Three-Eyed Raven, gaining the ability to see the past, present, and future. This gives him a unique perspective on the events of Westeros. The challenge with Bran's claim to the Iron Throne is that it's difficult to fully understand his motivations and intentions. The show doesn't provide a clear explanation for his actions, which leaves many viewers questioning his fitness to rule. His transformation into the Three-Eyed Raven gives him a unique insight into the history of Westeros and the ability to influence events. He's not driven by personal ambition or the desire for power. The nature of his ability makes him an enigmatic figure, whose motives are difficult to understand.

Bran's claim to the throne is based on his knowledge of the past, present, and future. His ability to see everything gives him a unique perspective on the needs of the realm and the potential threats it faces. He is not driven by personal ambition or the desire for power, making him a neutral figure. His detachment from personal desires and his ability to see the bigger picture make him a compelling choice for some. But for others, his detachment and lack of emotional connection create concerns. The questions about the nature of his ability and his role in the events of the series made his rise to power controversial. The show leaves the audience with little insight into his intentions and how his abilities would impact the governance of the Seven Kingdoms. His story is one of mystery and transformation.

The Chosen King

The choice of Bran as king was a controversial decision. His ability to see the past, present, and future gave him a unique perspective on the events of Westeros. He was not driven by personal ambition or the desire for power. His detachment and lack of emotional connection raised concerns for many viewers. The show left many people wondering about his intentions. His story highlights the challenges in ruling and the importance of having the right person in power. The mystery surrounding his motives makes it a controversial choice. His rule symbolizes the complexity of leadership and the challenges that arise.

Conclusion: Who Truly Deserved the Iron Throne?

So, who should have won the Iron Throne? Ultimately, it's a matter of perspective and personal preference. There are solid arguments for Daenerys, Jon, Tyrion, and Sansa. Daenerys had the ambition, the power, and a vision of justice. Jon had the honor, the strength, and a deep sense of duty. Tyrion had the intelligence, the wisdom, and the experience to guide the realm. Sansa had the resilience, the political acumen, and the dedication to her people. But in the end, the show chose Bran. His selection was not without controversy. It forces us to consider the nature of power, the complexities of leadership, and the unpredictable nature of fate. Game of Thrones leaves us pondering not just who should have won, but also what it truly means to rule.

Ultimately, there is no single